Seller-side Quality of Earnings review.

Reported EBITDA is not the number a buyer pays for. Before you go to market, we normalise it, rate every add-back for defensibility, and surface the red flags a buyer's quality-of-earnings (QoE) team will hit — while there's still time to fix them.

Why it matters

In most mid-market sales, the single largest cause of a price re-trade is an EBITDA bridge that does not survive the buyer's diligence. Aggressive add-backs get reversed, "non-recurring" costs are recharacterised as recurring, and the multiple applies to a lower number than the one in the information memorandum.

A vendor-side QoE review flips that dynamic: you table a defensible, documented bridge first — and you remediate the weak spots before the books open, not during exclusivity.

What you get

A partner-reviewed report — 6 to 10 pages.

Normalised EBITDA bridge

Reported → adjusted EBITDA, every step shown, nothing hidden in a single "after-tax" figure.

Add-back register

Each add-back rated defensible / at risk / weak — the way a buyer's QoE team will rate it.

Owner & related-party normalisations

Founder salary vs replacement cost, SCI rent to market, personal costs run through the P&L.

Non-recurring 3-year trend test

Which "one-off" items survive — and which recur under different labels and will be reversed.

Cash conversion & working capital

DSO / DIO / DPO, cash conversion, and the EBITDA-to-cash gap a buyer will probe.

Remediation, sequenced

The specific fixes, prioritised P1/P2, with a realistic timeline before go-to-market.

Built for FR & CH accounts

France (Plan Comptable Général). We reconcile from EBE (excédent brut d'exploitation) to an adjusted EBITDA the way a French QoE does — restating crédit-bail (lease financing), employee profit-sharing (participation), owner remuneration to market, related-party rents, benefits in kind, and non-recurring items (litigation, restructuring, transaction fees). QoE is now a near-mandatory step in French SME deals.

Switzerland (Code des Obligations / Swiss GAAP FER). Statutory CO accounts permit hidden reserves (réserves latentes) that mask true earning power — we unwind them, reconcile to a true-and-fair basis, and flag BVG/LPP pension exposure, related-party pricing and personal costs. In Swiss SME deals, QoE adjustments commonly run 15–30% of reported EBITDA.

How it works
01

Request & scope

Send the request below. A partner replies within one business day and shares a secure link for your accounts — three years of P&L and a trial balance.

02

Senior analysis

A senior team reconstructs the normalised bridge and stress-tests every add-back — the same lens a buyer's advisers will apply.

03

Branded report

You receive the partner-reviewed report in 5–7 business days, with a call to walk through it.

Fixed entry fee, creditable in full against an Exit Readiness Programme if you engage. It is a paid, confidential deliverable — not a generic checklist.

Request the review

Start with a defensible number.

Enter your details and a partner will be in touch within one business day to scope the review and send a secure link for your financials. Nothing is shared without your request.

Received. A partner will be in touch within one business day — check your inbox for confirmation.

Indicative, partner-reviewed deliverable for planning — not a statutory audit nor a formal QoE opinion. Any position must be validated with a qualified adviser before you act.